EU to vote on banning vulgarism ‘to eliminate sexual practice stereotypes and in equality’.
On 12 March the 754 MEPs will vote on a “ban on all in all forms of dirty wordography” in a bid to “eliminate gender stereotypes” that degrade women.
The proposal was prepared by the EU’s Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality.
It “calls on the EU and its member states to larn concrete action on discrimination against women in announce…” and Article 17 calls for “a ban on all forms of pornography in the media” .
The MEP’s will be suffrage on whether to endorse the conclusions of the report on eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU.
It proposes “a charter to which all internet operators will be invited to adhere” as part of the framework for achieving that goal.
Kartika Liotard, a Dutch MEP, drafted the report.
She is seeking “statutory measures to prevent any form of pornography in the media and in advertising and for a ban on advertising for pornographic products and sex tourism”.
She also aims is to emend awareness of gender equality in the European kernel - and the report contains a number of proposals for improving gender equality within EU members states.
The MEPs are also looking at creating state regulators with “a mandate to impose effective sanctions on companies and individuals promoting the sexualisation of girls”.
Iceland is already debating blocking online pornography, justifying the step by voicing fears round the damaging effects of pornography on children and women.
According to reports, Iceland is considering introducing internet filters, close up addresses and making it a crime to use Icelandic recognize cards to access pay-per-view pornography, in order to stop nation downloading or viewing pornography on the internet.
The EU’s porn ban proposal has non come without underground from civil rights groups and social bloggers.
The vague wording that has worried some, as the word “media” is undefined.
And MEP Christian Engström, deputy leader of the Swedish despoiler Party, fears that the ruling would also see naked pictures that people transport each other being considered as pornography, as wellhead as pictures included in private communications direct via email or social networks.
It is, he reckons, “an attempt to bug the article on information freedom in the European Convention of Human Rights”.
And Pirate Party founder change state Falkvinge described it as “a hair-raising attack on freedom of speech and freedom of expression”.
But Halla Gunnarsdóttir, adviser to Iceland’s interior minister said recently: “We are a progressive, liberal society when it comes to nudity, to sexual relations, so our approach is not anti-sex solely anti-violence.
“This is more or less children and gender equality, not about restrict free speech.
“”Research shows that the average age of children who see online porn is 11 in Iceland and we are filled about that and about the increasingly wild nature of what they are exposed to.
“This is concern coming to us from professionals since mainstream porn has become very brutal,” she said.
And Hildur Fjóla Antonsdóttir, a gender specialist at Iceland University, said: “This [Iceland’s] go-ahead is about narrowing the definition of porn so it does not include all sexually explicit material but rather material that can be described as portraying sexual activity in a violent or hateful way.
At this phase the EU vote on the report is not a legislative measure, although it does point to the way future legislation could take, and the votes will indicate how that can be expected to go.
Materials taken from Womens Views on News
0 comments:
Post a Comment